Thursday, January 15, 2009


I know I have been hardly focused on my blog these days. The new job at NCSU and the new grant has been keeping me very busy. I apologize. However, I have been given full release from all teaching duties at NCSU by a great dean and department chairman. I am writing some books, speaking at conferences, and working on my grant as well as writing some new proposals.

As you are aware, I have a small staff of graduate students and we have been working on a NIRT as well as some other projects. When I came to NCSU the goal was for me to create a project (soon to become a center) associated with the Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCOST). This is well on its way and I have met with architects who are designing our suite of offices in a building on NCSU's Centennial Campus. More on this later (

One of these projects are Citizen's Guides to Nanotechnology (CGN).

What are CGNs?

CGNs are written in a registry (term used in journalism to describe writing styles usually designed hierarchically against different types of audiences) appropriate for public consumption. CGNs do not cover the subject material exhaustively. Instead, they expose the reader to a sense of the subject material. In addition, they are electronic and will be edited. Hence, the first posted edition is 1.0 and we expect many subsequent posted editions.

Where are CGNs

Why CGNs?

There are many reasons. First and foremost has been the dismal failure on the part of the social science and societal researchers to provide a true clearinghouse for the general public. At best, we get a spattering of offerings and extensive digital libraries of technical papers and reports. Second we have a tendency on the part of media to exaggerate findings and concerns to increase viewership and readership. This often leads to fear appeals of all sorts. (I have a major piece on fear and nanoscience forthcoming). Third, my graduate students needed to learn how to communicate to a broad collection of audiences beyond the traditional academic ones that dominate their publishing outlets. As a scholar in public sphere discussions, I was drawn to move them toward learning to speak in a public registry. Finally, we have generated one of the most complete libraries of nanoscience and nanotechnology materials we feel exists. It includes nearly every government report and nearly every publication in the popular literature on nanoscience and nanotechnology. This file is huge and occupies six shelves, four file drawers, and a multi-gig digital library as well. Every article we felt was important and many that were not that appeared on the WWW was printed as a pdf into our electronic library so nothing has been lost. In addition, one of my students is converting hard copy to digital copy and we are posting our library on a university website so all researchers involved in our program can access the material (more on this later).

The first issue is on Nano and Cosmetics and was driven by the work I did for my recent articles in the Journal of Nanoparticle Research in December 2008. [ “Rhetorical gamesmanship in the nano debates over sunscreens and nanoparticles,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10. December 2008, 23-37. DOI 10.1007/s11051-008-9362-7 and “Reply from David Berube, NCSU,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 10. December 2008, 265-266. DOI 10.1007/s11051-008-9442-8.]

The second and third issue are being prepared. We have one on food products and another on food production. Others as you can see from our website (above) are in preparation.

So what is up with the blog?

I decided the best thing I can do is write about the state of nano on a weekly basis. Each week as we archive the week's articles in our virtual library, I will take notes and report what is happening and why what is reported as happening might be important. Unlike all other sites, we will not simply link you to article you can read on your own, we will digest the material and try to explain why it is or is not important, highlighting hyperbole and questioning focus.

Hope you enjoy the new direction for the blog. And expect weekly blogs (nothing like a promise to get me back to the keyboard).


viagra online said...

Wow this is excellent, well since a few years ago, some countries can already made robots and artificial parts for extremities and stuff, which is very nice, I guess with this technology could be possible to make better parts with better movement capacity.

price per head said...

Well this is my first visit. Great stuff over the blog. Illustration has something special and I think we can't avoid this kind of initiative.